Aquafind.com Aquatic Fish Database est. 1991

Search Supplier Directory
    Add Your Company
    Update Your Listing
Wholesale Supplier Short List
New Wholesale Supplier Additions

Search Companies Directory
    Add Your Company
    Update Your Listing
New Equipment & Services Additions

Wholesale Seafood Traders
Wholesale Aquaculture Traders
Wholesale Ornamental Fish Traders

Capelin + Imports & Exports
Catfish + Imports & Exports
Crab/Shellfish + Imports & Exports
Fish Meal + Imports & Exports
Fish Oil + Imports & Exports
Groundfish + Imports & Exports
Grouper + Imports & Exports
Lobster + Imports & Exports
Octopus + Imports & Exports
Oyster + Imports & Exports
Pelagics
Salmon + Imports & Exports
Scallop + Imports & Exports
Seabass + Imports & Exports
Shrimp + Imports & Exports
Squid + Imports & Exports
Tilapia + Imports & Exports
Tuna + Imports & Exports

Auctions
Calendar
Cod Links
Definitions and Terms
Finance/Credit
Fish Fact Sheets
Market Prices
Market Reports
Seafood Links
Tilapia Links

Follow Aquafind on Twitter






About Aquafind
Aquatic Posters
Articles
Book Store
Books
Contact AquaFind
Currency Converter
Featured Product Pages
Scientific Aquacultrue Papers
Weather
World Clock
Shrimp & Seafood Recipes

LANGUAGE
Chinese French German Italian Spanish Russian


Custom Search


Bookmark and Share

Poultry and fish production-a framework for their integration in Asia


David Little and Kriengkrai Satapornvanit

Aquaculture and Aquatic Resources Management
School of Environment, Resources and Development
Asian Institute of Technology
P.O. Box 4
Klongluang, Pathum Thani, 12120
Thailand.

Abstract

A framework for the integration of poultry and fish production in the Tropics and Sub-Tropics is proposed. Linkages between poultry and fish production may bring benefits to both components and the wider farming system. Both poultry production and processing wastes have value as nutrient inputs to fish and the water used for fish culture can act for evaparative cooling of poultry and fertigation of crops. The conceptual basis of controlled eutrophication of fishponds using poultry manure for the production of herbivorous fish is compared to feeding of poultry abbatoir wastes to carnivorous fish. A comparison of poultry production systems in terms of their potential for integration of fish culture is made; the modern feedlot is compared and contrasted with traditional systems. The nature of poultry wastes is reviewed with respect to the effect of poultry strain/species, diet, and poultry and waste management. The impacts of use of bedding materials, frequency of waste collection and contaminants are discussed. The use of poultry feedlot waste alone for fish culture is compared to the use of waste and additional fertilisers or feeds. The relative value of wastes from scavenging poultry alone or together with other inputs is analysed. The political economy of current poultry and fish production are considered in this article. The impacts on public health and the environment are also considered in the paper.

Introduction

Fish raised in semi-intensive, freshwater systems provide the major proportion of farmed, global production (FAO, 1995). A high proportion of this aquaculture occurs in rapidly developing Asia, which is also experiencing sharply increased consumption of poultry. Semi-intensive systems are usually based on ponds fertilised with livestock manure and fed with low cost supplementary feeds. The integration of livestock and fish can increase overall production intensity and economise on land, labour and water requirements for both poultry and fish. For example, one hectare of static water fish ponds can `process' the wastes of up to 1500 poultry, producing fish in quantities of up to 10 MT/ha without other feeds or fertilisers. Also, since effluents are few, environmental impacts are minimal.

The importance of poultry wastes in aquaculture is relatively recent. In areas of traditional fish culture, ruminant and pig manure have predominated as pond fertilisers in the Subcontinent and China respectively. Poultry manure was not used to any extent probably because small flock size and extensive management precluded collection.

Livestock production systems, and opportunities for reuse of wastes and byproducts, are changing. Vertical integration of the poultry industry by agribusiness has been stimulated by the biology and widespread acceptability of poultry, particularly chickens. Global trends in livestock production indicate that poultry, particularly layer and broiler chickens, are increasing faster than any other (FAO,1989,1990,1991,1993). The intensive nature of modern poultry production and processing tends to concentrate high quality byproducts, and this has stimulated their reuse. A range of poultry byproducts are produced and reused in livestock feeds including feather meal, bloodmeal, poultry litter meal etc. (Möller, 1980), and poultry wastes are also used as fertilisers and soil conditioners. Economic growth is fuelling demand for both poultry and fish in many parts of the Asia Pacific region and a major question is the extent to which their integration should be promoted further here and elsewhere.

Table 1: Matrix of livestock waste qualities and suitability for use in aquaculture.

(*** = high to * = low)

 

Factors increasing relative suitability for aquaculture

Livestock

type

Collectability

Acceptability

Nutrient density

Low opportunity cost

lack of

deleterious

compounds

Poultry

 

 

 

 

 

Feedlot

***

***

***

*

***

Scavenging

*

**

**

**

**

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pigs

 

 

 

 

 

Feedlot

***

*

**

**

***

Scavenging

*

*

*

**

**

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ruminants

 

 

 

 

 

Feedlot

***

**

**

**

**

Scavenging

*

**

*

**

*

 

  Poultry production wastes have inherent qualities that make them particularly valuable for fish production compared to other livestock wastes (Table 1). Poultry wastes are more nutrient dense than other livestock wastes. Typically they contain less moisture, fibre and compounds such as tannins that discolour water when used as fish pond fertilisers. Commercial `feedlot' production leads to concentration of nutrient-rich waste which can be handled and transported cost-effectively. This may mean that the opportunity costs of poultry manure are higher, and their use for horticulture particularly is common. The small individual size of poultry also allows their confinement and production directly over fish ponds.

Poultry manure has been used widely in both fresh and brackish water aquaculture. In the latter, Penaeid shrimp, Milkfish (Channos channos) and Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) have been the principle species raised (figure 1). Inland culture systems in which poultry and fish such as the carps, tilapias and catfish are raised in commercial and subsistence sytems are the focus of this review.

Poultry manure is now widely used in commercial freshwater aquaculture. In central Thailand, use of livestock wastes is the norm in the production of cheaper herbivorous fish. In other areas of Asia, intensification of culture using high quality feeds has reduced the importance of poultry waste to fish production. Predisposing factors to intensification include shortage of land or water and high product prices, but ready availability and competitively priced quality feeds are also critical. Wohlfarth and Schroeder (1979) identified the relative price of feeds and manures as being critical to determining input strategies.

Most published data concern integration of fish culture with modern poultry systems which are typically inappropriate for resource-poor farmers. Village or backyard poultry systems predominate in areas where modern breeds and systems are absent, or coexist in competition with them. Recent research indicates that integration of such poultry and backyard fish culture can also bring benefits at little extra cost.

Waste-fed aquaculture

Much of the nutrient content of feed given to poultry is voided as excretory or faecal waste. These nutrients can be used to support fish culture by their action as fertilisers that stimulate production of natural food organisms, such as phytoplankton, and detritus. A variety of carps and tilapias can grow rapidly on such natural feeds alone.

Stable and high water temperatures and sunlight ensure year-round growth of both fish and their natural feeds. The tropics, in which average water temperatures remain above 25 degree C, are ideal for culturing fish using poultry waste as inputs, although it is also practiced in sub-tropical and sub-temperate climates during suitable periods of the year (>20 degree C).

Poultry wastes and byproducts can provide the feed support of aquaculture across a range of intensities. Poultry wastes may act mainly (1) indirectly or (2) directly to support fish production.

Poultry manure can be used fresh, or after processing, to enhance natural food production in sun-lit tropical ponds (Figure 2). Although some nutrition may be derived directly from the waste, natural feed produced on the nutrients released from the wastes is more important. Fish feeding low in the food web - the carps and tilapias benefit most from this type of management since they can utilise plankton, benthic and detrital food organisms effectively.

Several factors affect the level of waste loading and standing stock of fish that can be supported. Greater sensitivity to dissolved oxygen limits carps to standing stocks of <3 MT/ha whereas tilapias may be harvested at standing stocks of over 5 MT/ha. Water quality, particularly the level of dissolved oxygen early morning, therefore limit the amount of wastes that can used. Input levels in excess of 75 kg DM/ha/d typically `overload' the system over a typical fish culture cycle (4-8 months), causing early morning deficits of oxygen. Balancing the production of wastes from poultry and the requirement of the fishpond is a key aspect of management.

The quality of poultry wastes used in fish culture varies greatly. High levels of spilt feed, for example, increase direct feeding value. Nutrient composition may be a useful guide to value but the availability or release of nutrients to the food web may be more important.

Conventional feed ingredients have been `replaced' with dried poultry wastes of various types, but low metabolisable energy and digestible protein levels limit their usefulness (Wohlfarth and Schroeder, 1979).

Poultry processing byproducts such as chicken bones, intestines and whole carcasses have greater value as `direct' feeds and are normally used for higher value fish species raised more intensively. High fish standing stocks can be maintained and yields produced using this type of product and management. Processing wastes can be used fresh, or after further processing, as good quality supplementary, or complete, feeds.

Traditional aquaculture

A lack of nutrients was a major constraint to traditional aquaculture and this remains true for much of the fish culture practiced in the developing World. Yields from carp-based polycultures in China were limited until recently by the paucity of diets for pigs and grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), and their manures, which provided a large portion of the nutrients entering the food web (Ruddle et al. 1983 ; Guo and Bradshaw, 1993). Recycling and reuse of nutrients on-farm has a long tradition born of necessity in the denser-settled areas of Asia. However, the high outputs of fish and other products from integrated systems reported from China and elsewhere in recent decades are related to greater nutrient inputs from off-farm (Edwards, 1993).

Lack of nutrients and sub-optimal stock management remain major constraints to the production of fish on small-scale farms, as they are for traditional livestock management generally. Greater outputs of fish necessitate more nutrient inputs to be used than are available on typical resource-poor farms. Such inputs may be either direct fish feeds or, feeds for livestock that in turn produce waste used in fish culture. Both need to be purchased from off-farm to supplement better reuse of on-farm wastes.

Factors affecting use of poultry wastes in fish culture

The type of poultry production system can greatly influence the amount of fish produced. Poultry systems producing nutrient-rich and collectable wastes are most valuable for fish production. A broad dichotomy exists between `modern', normally intensive poultry production and `traditional', extensive systems and this affects potential for integration with fish culture (Little, 1995). Edwards et al. (1983) describing the level of integration of poultry with fish in Central Thailand found large differences between small and large producers. In contrast with pigs in which even small herds are typically integrated, poultry (chickens, ducks) flock sizes of less than 100 birds were unlikely to be cultured with fish but larger flocks (>400) were usually integrated (Figure 3) . Modern `feedlots' raise large flocks and are generally capital intensive, highly dependent on off-farm support and profit-orientated. Generally raised on optimal, processed feeds in `feedlots', production cycles are rapid and all the high quality waste can be collected for use in fish culture.

In contrast, Klausner (1966) observing traditional management in a Northeast Thai village said that `the owners feel that there is not much point in taking pains and expending money in caring for chickens, when chickens seem quite capable of caring for themselves' (Figure 4).

Many factors appear to constrain close integration of traditional poultry and fish culture. The poor quality supplementary feeds usually given and the fact that confinement is restricted to overnight result in less, and poorer quality, manure being available for use in fish culture. Moreover, farm households may already be using the poultry waste which is collectable for other purposes such as fertilising backyard crops. Recent analysis of current poultry production in small-scale farming households reveals a marginal but important niche.

Poultry production waste characteristics

Poultry manures are nutrient-rich, but there is great variability in their quality at the time of use as fish production inputs. Although between 72-79 % of the dietary nitrogen, 61-87% phosphorous and 82-92% of the potassium was present in feedlot, egg-laying hens (Taiganides, 1978), the variability in terms of nutrients available (g nutrient/bird/day) can be much greater. The impacts of the gradual improvements in food conversion efficiencies attained by modern breeds and feeds are probably overidden by other factors, especially diet. Poultry raised on a balanced ration produce a higher quality, more nutrient dense waste than those fed a supplementary feed (Table 2 ).

Species, size and sex of bird directly affect the quantity of manure produced (Figure 5). The amount of feed spilt during feeding and drinking also varies with these factors together with the nature of the feed and feeding practice. Generally, larger birds produce more waste than small; the waste production increases rapidly over the rearing period of modern broilers as a result. Layers produce more calcium and phosphorous-rich excreta than broilers and the waste of replacement birds fed restricted diets high in fibre is correspondingly poorer than laying birds (Table 4).

In scavenging systems, manure quality is greatly affected by the quality and quantity of supplementary feeds, which in turn affects fish production. Egg-laying ducks fed paddy grain at night produced poorer quality manure than those fed rice bran. The amount of nitrogen and phosphorous in the manure was 50% and 25% respectively of that found in ducks fed relatively nutrient dense village rice bran (Table 2 ). Restricted feeding of rice bran during night-time confinement to muscovy ducks (Cairhina moschata) scavenging during the day reduced both quantity and quality of collectable wastes. Nitrogen in wastes declined with the level of restricted feed given from 1.28 g N/duck/day, for birds fed ad libitum to 0.55 g N/duck/day for ducks restricted to 50% of ad libitum feeding levels. (AFE, 1992) (Figure 6).

Supplementary feeds of different types drastically affect waste characteristics and their value for fish culture. In a trial in which three different supplementary feeds (village rice bran, ground maize and ground sorghum) were fed to pekin and muscovy ducks, both waste quantity and quality was affected (Figure 7). The degree of wastage, related to palatability and physical attributes of the feed, was an important factor (see below) but the intake and proximate composition greatly affected the value of waste for fish culture (Niang, 1990). Manures derived from maize-fed ducks were high in nitrogen, sorghum were intermediate and rice bran low reflecting the composition of the feeds themselves. Total nutrients in the waste tended to be higher than in the feeds suggesting the scavenged food tended to be of higher food value than the supplement.

Spilled feed is a loss to the poultry system but a gain to the fish because of it's direct feeding value. The method of food presentation (timing, frequency, location) affects the amount of feed available directly for fish. Feedlot ducks fed complete diets appear to waste less than birds allowed to scavenge during the day and given access to supplementary feed at night. Feed processing can reduce spillage; up to 15 % of granulated feeds may be lost compared to 10% if the same duck feed is pelletised (Barash et al.,1982). Feeding behaviour and the nature of different feeds may increase the amounts of feed available directly for fish. Waste feed left in the waterer comprised more than 25% of the collectable dry matter from scavenging muscovy ducks fed a supplement of village rice bran (AASP, 1996).

Table 2: Effect of feeding and management on waste characteristic of poultry.

 

 

System

 

Feed

 

Production

 

Waste

(g/animal/day)

 

Note

Poultry

Feed lot

Scaveng-ing

Concen-trate

Supple-mentary

Daily live W. gain

(g/d)

Laying rate

(%)

DM

N

P

 

Egg Laying duck

Yes

No

Yes

No

1.88

46-58

44.7

1.97

0.49

Edwards et al.,1983

Egg Laying Chicken

Yes

No

Yes

No

-

-

44

1.3

1.14

M ller,1980

Broiler Chicken

Yes

No

Yes

No

32

-

20

0.7

0.92

Hopkins & Cruz,1982

Egg Laying duck

No

Yes

No

Yes

0.38

16.3

59.9

1.16

0.69

AASP,1996 (rice bran)

Egg Laying duck

No

Yes

No

Yes

0.42

29.8

24.8

0.52

0.16

AASP,1996 (Paddy rice)

Muscovy duck

No

Yes

No

Yes

10.4-16

-

40-70

0.65-1.28

0.5-0.8

AASP,1992

 

Poultry species, strain and environment affect the normal conditions of poultry management in tropical environments and these interact to determine the final characteristics of wastes available for fish culture. The density of birds in a given system and their method of confinement -in small cages or batteries (such as for chicken layers) or in pens with bedding material (litter) affects the management of both the poultry and their waste. Confinement directly over fish ponds is used for both broiler and layer chickens but pens that give access to ponds stocked with fish for drinking and/or bathing are generally used only for ducks and geese.

Poultry house litter (PHL), which can be broiler, replacement or layer bird waste is produced from poultry raised in houses with bedding materials of various types. The type and management of these materials can affect nutrient content and availability for fish culture. Fermentation can result in losses of nitrogen, volatalised as ammonia, or becoming refractory and unavailable. Some vitamins may increase (vitamin B12) and some antibiotics (e.g. Chortetracycline) decrease with duration of storage (Muller, 1980).

 

Table 3: Check list of factors affecting characteristics of poultry waste and its use for aquaculture (modified after M ller, 1980).

  • used fresh or collected, stored and transported (CST) 
  • nature of bedding materials (bulk density, particle size, moisture retention capacity, compressibility, penetrability, hygroscopicty, biodegradabilty) 
  • type of bird (size, growth rate, efficiency, sex) 
  • housing (open, closed) 
  • litter management (regular/irregular removal) 
  • nature of ingredients in poultry ration (digestibility, nutrient density and composition) 
  • type of storage (aerobic, anaerobic, exposure to temperature, rain, wind) 
  • quantity of bedding materials per surface unit (nutrient dilution, microorganism activity)

 

Table 4: Mean Calcium and Phosphorus Content (on DM)

 Type of Waste

Ca

P

Ratio P:Ca

Broiler manure*

1.9

1.7

1 : 1.1

Broiler litter (one batch)

1.6

1.4

1 : 1.1

Replacement bird manure*

2.3

2.1

1 : 1.1

Layer manure*

7.5

2.6

1 : 2.9

Cattle manure*

1.3

0.8

1 : 1.6

Pig manure**

3.5

2.6

1 : 1.3

 Sources: * Muller, 1974-75, ** Pearce, 1977 cited by Muller 1980

 

Action of wastes in the pond

The rate of nitrogen and phosphorous release, particularly in the most available forms, (dissolved inorganic nitrogen, DIN; soluble reactive phosphorous, SRP) has been used as an indicator of wastes value for fertilisation of fish ponds. Laboratory leaching experiments indicated that DIN was rapidly released as ammonia-N , levelling off at 6 mg NH4-N/g DM chicken manure after 4-5 days (Knud-Hansen et al., 1991). Storage of duck wastes under aerobic conditions for a period of 4 weeks reduced both total nitrogen in the waste and the amount released subsequently as ammonia (Ullah, 1989).

The type of ingredients fed poultry can affect the subsequent manure quality and release of nutrients for pond fertilisation. Subsitution of a cassava mixture of leaf and root meal for village rice bran in complete diets of broiler muscovy ducks resulted in a more nitrogen-rich manure but a similar cumulative release of nitrogen (5.5-6.7 mg/g DM). Release of DIN varied between 20-74% of the total in the waste (Figure 8). A greater proportion of phosphorous was released as SRP in all the wastes and the amount was inversely related to the level of cassava in the diet (AIT data).

Manure obtained from scavenging muscovy ducks fed variable levels of a rice bran supplement (100, 75 and 50% of ad libitum) had different release characteristics. Significantly more DIN was released by ducks fed less supplementary rice bran suggesting that the protein in the natural feeds ingested during scavenging were less refractory than the nitrogen contained in village rice bran. SRP showed the inverse trend, with ducks fed ad libitum producing manure richer in phosphorous, of which more was released in the available form (AIT data).

Manures release other factors apart from nutrients that may have adverse effects on water quality and inevitably, fish production. Shevgoor et al. (1994) found that tannins and flavanoids were a major factor in the poor water quality observed in ruminant manure-fed systems. Substitution of cassava leaf for rice bran in complete diets for muscovy ducks correlated with increased levels of tannin released from manure (AIT data). The value of manures, including poultry manure, as a source of detritus and the role of detritus in the direct nutrition of fish has been much debated (Schroeder, 1978; Colman and Edwards, 1987). The stimulation of bacterial production, both in the water column and sediments is known to be stimulated by addition of poultry waste (Moriarty, 1987). Animals that filter feed or graze on bacteria attached to detritus directly, or consume the grazers, are therefore likely to benefit directly through this mechanism. Both food and dissolved oxygen are required to maintain high fish yields and phytoplankton, both alive and as detritus, is the most important source of both in fertilised ponds (Colman and Edwards, 1987, Knud-Hansen et al, 1993).

Classification of poultry-fish systems

A framework for poultry-fish systems is given in Table 5 and Figure 9. Feedlot and scavenging poultry represent two ends of a continuum of systems (Little and Edwards, 1994). The type of producer and characteristics of the production system and waste collection methods are distinct. In both cases however, poultry wastes may be part of a range of inputs used to produce fish. The use of poultry processing wastes is distinct and considered seperately, although this strategy is linked closely to feedlot broiler production.

Van der Lingen described the concept of increased carrying capacity and fish yields if more nutritional inputs are complemented with higher stocking densities (Edwards, 1986) and (Figure 10). Yields from fertilisation alone may be increased with the use of supplementary feeds. Further increases in density and yield rely on improvements in feed quality and quantity so that they become the primary source of nutrition to the fish. Poultry wastes are used across a range of intensities, and for different purposes. Poultry wastes, inorganic fertilisers and feeds are to some extent substitutable. Poultry waste can be used in place of inorganics or feeds, inorganics in place of manures or feeds, and feeds in place of either type of fertiliser. Thus if manures are in short supply, inorganics can be used to optimise nutrient loadings and feeds to further increase yields. Feed may be substituted, to some extent, with fertilisers.

Table 5: Input and output of poultry waste fed-aquaculture

 

Inputs (g/m2/day)

 

Output

 

System

Poultry waste

Other

Fish

(gfish/m2/day)

System

 

DM

N

P

DM

N

P

 

 

 

Feedlot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Egg-laying ducks

6.71

0.3

0.07

-

-

-

Tilapia

2.82

200 m2 ponds, 6 months (Edwards etal.,1983)

Broiler chickens

10.0

0.4

0.46

-

-

-

Tilapia, Common carp

2.87

400 m2 ponds, 3 months (Hopkins & Cruz,1982)

Layer chicken

14.3

0.4

0.3

-

-

-

Tilapia

1.33

1,000 m2 ponds, 5 months (Green et al., 1994)

Layer chicken

1.07

0.03

0.018

-

0.47

0.23

Tilapia

2.75

220 m2 ponds, 5 months (Knud-Hansen et al., 1991)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scavenging

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Muscovy duck

9.7

0.15

0.10

-

-

-

Tilapia

1.38

5 m2 tanks, 3 months ; duck fed 75 % ad libitum (AFE,1992)

Egg-laying duck

3.0

0.23

0.03

-

0.17

-

Tilapia

1.21

200 m2 ponds, 4months (AASP,1996): rice bran

Egg-laying duck

1.24

0.20

0.01

-

0.17

-

Tilapia

0.53

200 m2 ponds, 4months (AASP,1996) : paddy rice

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Feedlot systems

Most of the poultry-fish systems described in the literature use waste from feedlots. Modern breeds of poultry raised on balanced feeds give the most nutrient-rich waste and produce the most fish, but systems are frequently suboptimal resulting in inefficient waste or space use. Poultry manure is used either directly on-site, through the siting of poultry houses over ponds, or after collection, storage and transport to the site of fish culture.

Construction of the poultry house over the pond allows waste to drop directly in, saving labour costs (Figure 11). Also, in the periurban, flood-prone land often used, the cost to fill land for poultry housing, and the opportunity cost of land itself, are reduced. Confining poultry next to, or over water can also improve their productivity under tropical conditions. Evaparative cooling can reduce heat stress in broilers (Theimsiri, 1992) and access to water improves feather quality of ducks, although growth may suffer (Edwards, 1986). Ducks free ranging over ponds in large numbers can damage dykes and cause water quality problems, restriction of the ducks to the water and pen prevents this problem (Edwards et al., 1983). However, evidence from on-station research and farmers suggests that access to complete feeds and some degree of scavenging optimises egg production in Khaki-Campbell ducks (AIT, 1986).

Fish species is a critical factor in determining loading rates of poultry waste since there is a range of sensitivity to dissolved oxygen among the commonly cultured fish species. Air-breathing fish, such as clarias catfish, and the silver-striped catfish, Pangasius hypothalmus can tolerate the highest input levels and, at the high stocking densities normally raised, also require extra feed to sustain growth. These fish species are also probably inefficient at using the phytoplankton-dominated food web. In contrast, the microphagous Nile tilapia is more sensitive to low dissolved oxygen early morning but thrives at numbers of poultry between 1000 and 1500 egg-laying ducks/ha without other inputs. Using poultry manure alone net extrapolated yields of up to 12 MT or a standing stocks of 5-6 MT/ha appear possible in monocultures of tilapia.

Polycultures of carps are often considered most efficient in waste-fed ponds but greater sensitivity to dissolved oxygen necessitates lower input levels. Hopkins and Cruz (1982) found poor survival of the more sensitive common carp in a tilapia-dominated polyculture, and Yakupitiyage et al. (1991) recorded poor survival of large silver barb (Puntius gonionotus) under similar circumstances. Research using more sensitive Indian Major carps has normally been undertaken at lower loading rates (<100-500 poultry/ha; Jhingran and Sharma, 1978, 1980).

Temperature regime affects the level of wastes that can be used in ponds and this is reflected in the lower stocking densities in eastern Europe (Edwards, 1986). Low temperatures reduce the amount of waste that can be processed by a given area of fish ponds. The fish kills reported in Hong Kong (Sin, 1980) are related to a continued build up of waste during the cool season causing a subsequent bacterial and plankton boom as temperatures rise. This phenomeneon, equivalent to a massive overloading, quickly removes oxygen from the water.

The dynamics of poultry flocks can make management of the waste for fish culture problematic. Direct use of egg-laying poultry for instance, in which the birds are of constant weight and produce fairly constant levels of waste, are easier to manage than broilers in which waste availability is cyclical (Hopkins and Cruz, 1982) ; (Figure 12). The timely availability of replacement stock, vetinary support, and market demand may be critical to maintaining both poultry, and their waste, production.

Higher loadings of waste necessitate water exchange or mechanical aeration to maintain dissolved oxygen. Green et al. (1994). significantly improved yields of Nile tilapia at high loading rates of chicken manure (1000 kg DM/ha/week) using mechanical aeration to ensure high survival of fish. Additional aeration at levels of 10% saturation were sufficient to improve yields by 20% over unaerated ponds. Regular exchange of water to reduce phytoplankton biomass can alleviate water quality problems caused by overloading. In a well designed system this would be avoided as effluents reflect inefficent nutrient reuse and could cause negative impacts on surrounding environment. Overloading of poultry waste can also be avoided by housing poultry over concrete or earthen floors rather than directly over ponds and regular manual or mechanical collection and addition. This option may reduce construction costs considerably and also enables farmers to sell manure surplus to their requirements.

Supplementation of feedlot wastes

Various factors may limit the size of a poultry flock that a farmer can manage and integrate with fish culture, reducing wastes to levels below optimum. Edwards et al.(1983) found that problems marketing duck eggs, and high feed costs, constrained small-scale farmers maintaining even 30 ducks in feedlots over small ponds (200m2) and suggested the waste from smaller numbers of ducks could be supplemented with direct feeding of fish.

Farmers with limited numbers of poultry for their pond area need additional nutrient inputs to optimise productivity and fish yield and inorganic fertilisers may be the most cost-effective option. Inorganix fertilisers are a cheaper form of nitrogen and phosphorous than purchased poultry manure in many situations (Table 6), and highest yields of Nile Tilapia were achieved with relatively low loadings of poultry manure. The optimal level of poultry manure in ponds fertilised with high levels of inorganic fertilisers (5 kg N/ha/d) was found to be around 75 kg/ha/week for a monoculture of Nile tilapia in Thailand (Knud-Hansen et al.,1991). These low levels reflect the subtle balance of dissolved oxygen and food production in a highly eutrophic pond. Green et al. (1994) recorded similarly high yields (>20 kg/ha/day) of Nile tilapia using higher levels of chicken manure in combination with inorganic fertilisers. There are indicators, however, that compared to tilapia, carps raised at lower nutrient loading rates perform better when fertilised with organic manures in addition to inorganics (AASP, 1996) (Figure 13). Also, the use inorganics may be constrained by their poor availability or high opportunity cost.

Supplementing use of poultry manure with cheap and available direct feeding of fish is an alternative strategy. The impact of supplementary feed on yields of fish in ponds fertilised with poultry waste is affected by many factors. The level of natural feed to some extent affects the effectiveness of th supplementary feed; more natural feed allows greater feeding of a high-energy supplement to `spare' the protein requirements and support the growth of more fish (Hepher, 1981). Optimising levels of supplementary feeds is complicated by the variable levels of waste poultry feed mixed with the manure.

Strategic use of supplementary feeds such as rice bran can boosted yields of a duck manure-fed Nile tilapia monoculture by between 10-150% (AIT, 1986). The use of feeds in this way, however, may not be cost effective. One trial clearly demonstrated the `Law of Diminishing returns' when a low feeding rate (1% Bodywt/day) increased yields by between 28-40% profitably, depending on duck manure level (Figure 14) . A further doubling in feeding rate (2% Bodywt/day) increased yields further by a mere 4% or reduced them by 16% respectively (Yakupitiyage et al. 1991); (Table 7) ; (Figure 15)

 

Table 6: Economic comparison of different fertilizers with respect to available nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and carbon (C) (US$ = 25 Baht), (Knud-Hansen, 1993) 

 

 

Fertilizer

 

Cost

(baht/50 g)

Available

N

(baht/kg)

Available

P

(baht/kg)

Available

C

(baht/kg)

Chicken manure

20a

76b

194c

7d

Urea

240

10

-

24

TSP

450

-

45

-

NaHCO3

1000

-

-

140

aWet weight

bAssumes 40 % dry weight of total N is available (Knud-Hansen et al. 1991).

cAssumes 10 % dry weight of total P is available (Knud-Hansen et al. 1993).

dAssumes 50 % dry weight of organic C oxidizes to DIC.

 

Table 7: Partial budget analysis of rice bran as a supplementary feed for fish integrated with ducks. US$ = 25 baht. Cost of rice bran = 0.14 US$. Fish market price : Central Thailand = 0.52 US$/kg, Northeast Thailand = 1 US$. (Yakupitiyage et. al., 1991)

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue and profits (US$)

Number

of ducks

(200 m2

pond)

 

Weight

of rice

bran (kg)

Net fish

yield

(kg/200 m2

6 months)

Increased

yield due

to rice

bran (kg)

 

Additional cost

(US$)

 

Central

Thailand

 

Northeast

Thailand

Previous study (AIT 1986)

 

 

Rev.

Pro.

Rev.

Pro.

10

-

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

164

68

20

25

10

-15

20

-5

30

101

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

232

134

33

36

17

-19

36

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Present study

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

78

86

26

12

14

2

26

14

30

 

91

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

95

116

26

15

14

-1

26

11

Rev. = revenue, Pro. = profits/

 

This suggests that overall dry matter loadings into ponds receiving both feeds and fertilisers should be considered. The variable response of fish species with different feeding niches within the polyculture also illustrates that supplementary feeding should be strategic. Although manure level and rice bran acted independently to boost overrall yields, Nile tilapia responded most to duck density and silver barb only to feeding rate.

Supplementary feeding of fertilised ponds is only necessary if the carrying capacity is exceeded. Green et al. (1994) found no benefits to yields in poultry-manure fertilised ponds when high quality pelleted feed was also given. Probably, growth could be supported by natural feed alone at the low fish stocking densities (2/m2) used.

Yields may also be constrained by other factors such as seasonally low temperature and dissolved oxygen levels. The relatively low yields reported by in Hong Kong (1.5-4.7 MT/ha/year; Sin, 1980), despite supplementary feeding of carp polycultures fertilised with duck manure, appear to be related to such water quality factors. Green et al. (1994) also reported poorer yields in supplementary-fed, poultry waste-fertilised ponds during cooler periods.

Reducing feeding costs of more intensive systems by fertilising ponds with poultry manure is another strategy that has attracted attention by farmers and researchers alike. Clearly, the fish species raised need to be suitable for culture in plankton-rich, waste-fed systems. Green et al. (1994) found that the tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum), in contrast to the Nile tilapia, grew poorly in fertilised systems without supplementary feed (Figure 16).

Manuring and feeding appears to be a cost effective strategy for intensification of Nile tilapia culture. In Taiwan yields of up to 18 MT/ha are produced in duck manure-fertilised, aerated ponds in which the fish are also fed pellets in which the fish are also fed pellets on demand (Liao and Chen 1983) (Figure 17). Fertilisation is also essential component of high-yielding, commercial polycultures in Isreal (Hepher and Pruginin's 1981)

Feed costs may also be reduced by feeding only in the later stages of the culture period, when the nutritional needs of the fish exceed the level supported by natural feed alone. Green et al. (1994) found that at densities of 1 fish/m2, tilapia could be raised on poultry waste alone for the first 3 months of an 137 day production without any differences in final yield. Fattening with pelleted feed over the final 50 days increased yields and individual fish size significantly.

Scavenging systems

The use of scavenging poultry wastes in aquaculture is rare; few systems have been described in anything but qualitative terms in the literature. The inherent variability of low input scavenging systems, including waste output, is much greater than conventional poultry-fish systems; the production function between waste level and fish production, for example, is far more variable. The relationship between number of poultry and fishpond area is less clear cut when the wastes from scavenging birds are used. Waste collection is normally limited to overnight to allow enough time for the poultry to obtain natural foods, but absolute amounts of waste collected may still be high (Table 2). If supplementary feeds are given ad libitum, and all wastes are used for fish culture (see above), dry matter levels/ bird may be higher than those produced in feedlot systems. Overloading of these wastes can have clear negative impacts on water quality and fish yields.

Developing fish culture based solely or partly on the wastes of current poultry production requires an understanding of feed constraints. In Northeast Thailand, the main supplementary feeds used for poultry, village rice bran and unmilled paddy rice, are available only in limited quantities. Feeding restricted amounts of feeds to a larger flock of poultry can result in more poultry and fish from the same amount of rice bran (AASP, 1996) (Table 8), (Figure 18) provided that the scavenging feed resource base us significant (Tadelle,1997). The quality of scavenging environment might be expected to affect the requirement for supplementary feed and the final quality of wastes produced. Natural forage is frequently seasonal and crop harvests may produce short-lived abundances of residues (dropped paddy, spilt maize) that will affect waste composition.

The relatively low nutrient density of wastes from scavenging poultry fed supplementary feeds explains the rationale for using them as partial inputs into fish culture. Farmers understand this limitation; in a study of farmer practice in Udorn Thani, farmers tended to use a variety of inputs including plant leaves, ruminant manure and rice bran in addition to poultry manure (AASP, 1996).

The quality and quantity of supplementary fed to scavenging poultry are key factors in determinging waste characteristics (see above) and subsequent fish yield. Feeds high in cassava products generally depressed fish yields, possibly due to the levels of tannins and unavailability of nutrients. Rice bran, corn and sorghum-fed ducks produced highly dissimilar wastes and subsequent fish yields based on similar numbers of ducks were vary variable (Naing, 1990). Egg-laying ducks allowed to scavenge, and fed either supplementary rice bran or paddy rice at night showed that tradeoffs may be involved. Egg yields were higher,(Table 2) but fish yields barely half that from ponds in which ducks were fed rice bran (Table 4; AASP, 1996); (Figure 19) .

Inorganic fertilisation can have a major impact on yields (x 100%) of microphagous fish such as Nile tilapia in ponds receiving scavenging poultry wastes. In small ponds, the relative amounts required are also affordable, given the value of the fish produced (Edwards et al, 1996).

Table 8: Restricted feeding of scavenging ducks makes better use of ther same amount of rice bran. 

For Every 100 kg rice bran

  • 14.0 Kg duck + 5.0 - 6.8 Kg fish if ducks fed ad libitum (100 %)
  • 17.0 Kg duck + 7.3 - 10.2 Kg fish if ducks fed restricted (75 %)
  • 20.3 Kg duck + 9.6 - 10.8 Kg fish if ducks fed restricted (50 %)

 

(The range of fish yields reflects the duck stocking density/pond mean; lower stocking density/larger pond gives higher yield)

  

Poultry processing wastes

Boneless chicken meat is now an international commodity that resource-rich developing countries, with vertically integrated poultry industries, compete to produce and market. Low labour and feed costs, and good infrastructure, are necessary preconditions to develop the business that can produce large amounts of high quality byproducts suitable for intensive fish culture.

Poultry slaughterhouse wastes are in great demand for feeding hybrid clarias catfish (Clarias macrocephalus x Clarias garipinus) in Thailand. Heads, viscera and thigh bones are the main byproducts fed fresh after simple on-farm grinding and mixing with a binder. Food conversion ratios of 4-5 (wet:wet basis) are attained under farm conditions, similar to levels reported by Prinsloo and Schoonbee (1987) for the use of chicken offal and dead whole chickens fed to Clarias gariepinus.

Benefits -the political economy of poultry-fish systems

Modern agribusiness control over production and marketing of poultry products is in great contrast to the fish component of integrated farming. Agribusiness companies control the breeds, the feeds and the marketing of broiler chickens in central Thailand, and for hen eggs in Northeast thailand (Engle and Skaldany, 1992). In contrast, the fish stocked are purchased from local entrepreneur breeders (Little et al, 1987), fed on poultry and other wastes and marketed directly, or through local middlemen and markets. Farmers are willing to contract-grow broiler chickens over their fishponds for minimal return, in order to gain the benefits of high cultured fish yields. This has resulted in long term declines in the price of both chicken and freshwater fish over the past decade (Figure 20).

Changes in production and demand for poultry and fish stimulate new opportunities for their integration . Increasing proportions of chicken consumed and exported as boneless products has spurred the use of the slaughterhouse wastes as feeds in Thailand, prinicipally for a recently developed hybrid catfish which thrives under such culture conditions (Little et al., 1994). These forms of production however, are concentrated in the hands of relatively few, richer farmers and entrepreneurs. Urban consumers benefit from lower prices for poultry and freshwater fish but rural small-scale production may be constrained through a lack of feeds and markets (Figure 21).

Environmental and public health aspects

The concentration of nutrients that feedlot agriculture encourages can lead to pollution of surface waters but controlled eutrophication of static water ponds stocked with herbivorous fish can act as on-site treatment. Impacts on surface waters are minimal, providing water exchange is avoided. Nutrient budgets indicate that although only 15-20 % of input nitrogen and 8-12% of phosphorous are recovered as fish, most of the nutrients accumulate in the sediments (Edwards, 1993). Loss of nutrients with drainage water (<10% of both N and P) (Boyd, 1985). Waste-fed aquaculture is therefore more likely to alleviate pollution from livestock production than cause it, although intensive, long term use of wastes and porous soils could lead to some nutrient losses to surface and groundwater resources.

Public health concerns have been raised about the integration of poultry and fish production on several levels. The risks of direct pathogen transfer to humans in fishponds fertilised with manures, whether consumers, producers or intermediaries, have been most assessed (e.g. AIT, 1986; Buras, 1993). Although faecal bacteria and viruses are present in poultry manures, rapid attentuation of pathogens occurs in most stable, waste-fed ponds (Edwards, 1986, 1993). Clearly, the control of Salmonella and enteric bacteria capable of causing human disease is important. Practically this requires control of these pathogens below threshold levels that can lead to infection of organs and muscle in cultured fish (Buras, 1993).

The control of poultry disease, however, leads to the concern that poultry feeds containing prophylactic antimicrobials can encourages the emergence of antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria. The relative risks are likely to be insignificant compared to other causes such as direct human abuse (Dalsgaard,1993 pers comm.) or chemotherapy of fish themselves (Austin, 1993).

There has also been implicit connections made between integrated livestock-fish systems and influenza pandemics (Scholtissek and Naylor, 1988); this disturbing theory has led to widespread comment and discussion of the desirability and impacts of integrated farming (Edwards et al., 1988; Morse,1990; Skladany,1992 ). The theory maintains that integrated aquaculture encourages the raising of pigs and poultry together to provide manure for fish and that this in turn increases the risks of new forms of influenza developing. Pigs may indeed act as `mixing vessels' for avian viruses that can transfer to forms more virulent to humans, but fish ponds have had little role in bringing pigs and poultry together on farms. Indeed, pigs, poultry and fish together are rare on both large and small-scale farms in Asia. Intensified poultry-fish systems are more likely to separate poultry from pigs, and other livestock, than traditional farms (Edwards, 1991) (Figure 22).

The purposeful eutrophication of water leading to blooms of toxic bluegreen algae has also been raised as an issue (Pullin, 1993). The poisioning of mammals drinking water containing toxic strains of Microcystis aeruginosa is established in temperate climates and research has indicated that the Nile tilapia avoids ingesting toxic strains (Beveridge, 1993). Under practical conditions, however, such fish grow fastest in ponds dominated by this same species of algae (Colman and Edwards, 1987). Although the possibility of poisoning of fish and mammals from poultry-waste fertilised water exists, their controlled use in fish ponds reduces the likelihood of pollution to other water bodies

 

References

AFE, Agricultural and Food Engineering, 1992. Final Report-Muscovy Duck Project : The development of economic feeding systems for Muscovy ducks (Cairhina moschata) in duck/fish integration in Thailand (15 May 1988 - 31 December 1991). Agricultural and Food Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology, 36 pages.

AASP, Agricultural and Aquatic Systems Program, 1996. Final Technical Report-IDRC: The development of feeding systems for fish and an integrated duck-fish system (30 December 1991 - 31 April 1996). Agricultural and Aquatic Systems Program, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology. 41 pages.

AIT, 1986. Buffalo/fish and duck/fish integrated systems for small-scale farmers at the family level. Agricultural and Food Engineering Division, Asian Institute of Technology. 138 p.

Austin, B. 1993. Environmental issues in the control of bacterial diseases of farmed fish. p.237-251 In R.S.V.Pullin, H. Rosenthal and J.L.MacClean (eds) Environment and aquaculture in developing countries. ICLARM conf. Proc. 31, 359p.

Barash, H, I. Plavnik and R. Moav, R.1982.Integration of duck and fish farming: experimental results. Aquaculture 27, 129-140.

Beveridge, M.C..M. and M.J.Phillips, 1993. Environmental impact of tropical inland aquaculture. p.213-236 In R.S.V.Pullin, H. Rosenthal and J.L.MacClean (eds) Environment and aquaculture in developing countries. ICLARM conf Proc. 31, 359p.

Beveridge, M.C. M., Baird, D.J., Rahmatullah, S.M., Lawton, L.A., Beattie, K.A., Codd, G.A., 1993. Grazing Rates on Toxic and Non-Toxic Strains of Cyanobacteria by Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and Oreochromis niloticus. Journal of Fish Biology 43:6, 901-907.

Boyd, C. 1985. Chemical budgets for channel catfish ponds.Trans.Am.Fish.Soc. 114:291-298

Buras, N. 1993. Microbial safety of produce from wastewater-fed aquaculture.p.285-295. In R.S.V.Pullin, H. Rosenthal and J.L.MacClean (eds) Environment and aquaculture in developing countries. ICLARM conf. Proc. 31, 359 p.

Colman, J. and P.Edwards.1987. Feeding pathways and environmental constraints in waste-fed aquaculture:balance and optimization, p.240-281. In D.J.W. Moriarty and R.S.V. Pullin (eds). Detritus and microbial ecology in aquaculturee. ICLARM Conference Proceedings 14, 420 p. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, Philippines.

Edwards, P., K.E Weber, E.W. McCoy, C.Chantachaeng, C. Pacharaprakiti, K. Kaewpaitoon,and S. Nitsmer. 1983. Small-scale fishery project in Pathum Thani Province, Central Thailand: a socioeconomic and technological assessment of status and potential. AIT Research Report No. 158, AIT, Bangkok, 256 p

Edwards,P. 1986. Duck/Fish Integrated Farming Systems. p 267-291. In D.J Farrell and P Stapleton (eds). Duck Production Science and World Practice.430 p

Edwards, P., C. Kwei Lin; K.Leong Wee; D.Little and N.L.Innes-Taylor., 1988. Nature. 333:505-506

Edwards,P. 1991. Integrated farming and influenza pandemics. World Aquaculture 22(3) 2-6

Edwards, 1993. Environmental issues in integrated agriculture-aquaculture and wastewater-fed fish culture systems, p.139-170. In R.S.V.Pullin, H. Rosenthal and J.L.MacClean (eds) Environment and aquaculture in developing countries. ICLARM conf Proc. 31, 359 p.

Edwards, P, H.Demaine,N. Innes Taylor and D. Turongruang. 1996. Suataianble aquaculture for small-scale farmers: Need for a balanced Model. Outlook on Agriculture Vol.25, No.1, 19-26 p.

Engle, C.R., Skladany, M., 1992. The Economic Benefit of chicken Manure Utilization in Fish Production in Thailand. CRSP Research Reports 92-45,Program Management Office, Pond Dynamics/Aquaculture Collaborative Research Support Program, USA. 8 pages.

FAO,1989. FAO yearbook: Production Vol.42:1988. FAO Statistics Series No.88. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, page 241-252, 266-268.

FAO,1990. FAO yearbook: Production Vol.43:1989. FAO Statistics Series No.94. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, page 241-251, 265-267.

FAO,1991. FAO yearbook: Production Vol.44:1990. FAO Statistics Series No.99. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, page 189-198, 212-214.

FAO,1993. FAO yearbook: Production Vol.46:1992. FAO Statistics Series No.112. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, page 189-198, 202-214.

FAO Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Service, Fishery Resources Division. 1995. Review of the state of world fishery resources:aquaculture. FAO Fisheries Circular, No.886. Rome, FAO. 127 p

Green, B.W., D.R. Teichert-Coddington and T.R Hanson. 1994. Development of semi-intensive aquaculture technologies in Honduras. International Center for Aquaculture and Aquatic Environments Research and development Series Number 39, Auburn University, Alabama, USA, 48 p

Guo, J.Y and A.D. Bradshaw. 1993. The flow of nutrients and energy though a Chinese farming system. Journal of Applied Ecology,30,86-94

Hepher, B. and Pruginin, Y., 1981. Commercial Fish Farming, with special reference to fish culture in Israel. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 261 p.

Hopkins, K.D. and E. M. Cruz, 1982. The ICLARM-CLSU, integrated animal-fish farming project: final report. Vol. ICLARM Technical Reports 5. Freshwater Aquaculture Center-central Luzon State University and International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Nueva Ecija, Philippines. 96 p.

Jhingran, V.G. and Sharma, B.K., 1978. Operational research on aquaculture in West Bengal. Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, West Bengal, Bulletin No.27. Mimeograph.

Jhingran, V.G. and Sharma, B.K. , 1980. Integrated livestock-fish farming in India. (edited by R.S.V. Pullin and Z.H. Shehadeh) Proceedings of the ICLARM-SEARCA Conference on Integrated Agriculture-Aquaculture Farming Systems, ICLARM Conference Proceedings 4, Manila, August 1979, pp. 135-142, ICLARM-SEARCA, Manila, Philippines.

Klausner, W.J. 1966 Reflections on Thai culture. Suksit Siam. Bangkok. 332 p

Knud-Hansen, C.F., Batterson, T.R., McNabb, C.D. and Kitjar Jaiyen, 1991. Yield of Nile Tilapia (Orechromis niloticus) in fish ponds in Thailand using chicken manure supplemented with Nitrogen and Phosphorus. In Eighth Annual Administrative Report (1 September 1989 to 31 August 1990). (Eds: Hillary S. Egna, Jim Bowman, and Marion McNamara) Pond Dynamics/Aquaculture CRSP, Oregon, USA, 54-62 p.

Knud-Hansen, C. F., Batterson, T.R., McNabb, C.D., Harahat, I.S., Sumantadinata, K. and Eidman, H.M., 1991. Nitrogen input, primaryproductivity and fish yield in fertilized freshwater ponds in Indonesia. Aquaculture, 94:49-63.

Knud-Hansen, C. F., Batterson, T.R., McNabb, C.D., 1993. The role of chicken manure in the production of Nile Tilapia (Orechromis niloticus). Aquaculture and Fisheries Management,24:483-493.

Liao, I. C. and Chen,T. P., 1983. Status and Prospects of Tilapia Culture in Taiwan. In International Sysmposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture, Proceedings. (EDS: Fishelson, L., Yaron, Z.) Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, page 588-598.

Little, D.C., M. Skladany and R. Rode. 1987. Small-scale hatcheries in north-east Thailand. Aquaculture and Fisheries Management,18:15-31.

Little, D.C., K. Kaewpaitoon and T. Haitook. 1994. The commerical use of chicken processing wastes to raise hybrid catfish (Clarias gariepinus x Clarias macrocephalus) in Thailand. Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly. 25-27

Little, D.C. and P.Edwards. 1994. Alternative strategies for livestock-fish integration with an emphasis on Asia. Paper presneted at the International Workshop on Integrated Fish farming, 11-15th October 1994, Wu-Xi, China

Little, D.C. 1995. The development of small-scale poultry fish integration in Northeast Thailand:Potential and Constraints. In J.J. Symoens and J.C. Micha (eds) Proceedings of a seminar "The management of integrtaed freshwater agro-piscicultural ecosystems in tropical areas", Brussels, 16-19 May 1994.

Maclean, J.L., 1993. Developing-Country Aquaculture and Harmful Algal Booms. In Pullin, R.S.V., Rosenthal, H., Maclean, J.L., 1993. Environment and Aquaculture in Developing countries. ICLARM Conf. Proc. 31. 252-284 p.

Morse, S.S.,1990. Stirring up Trouble, Environmental Disruption Can Divert Animal Viruses into people. The Sciences Sept./Oct. page 16-21.

M ller, Z. O., 1980. Feed from animal wastes: state of knowledge. FAO animal production and health paper, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United nations, Rome. 190 p.

Naing, T. 1990. Potential of rice bran, corn and sorghum as supplements for scavengingmeat ducks. MSc thesis. Asian Institute of Technology. 71 p

Prinsloo, J.F.and H.J.Schoonbee. 1987. Utilization of chicken offal in the production of the African sharptooth catfish Clarias gariepinus in the Transkei. Water SA 13(2), 129-132

Ruddle, K, J.L Furtado, G.F.Zhong and H.Z. Deng. 1983. The mulberry dike-carp pond resource system of the Zhujiang Delta, People's republic of China :I Environmental context and system overview. Applied Geography,3:45-62.

Scholtissek, C. and Naylor, E., 1988. Fish Farming and Influenza Pandemics. Nature Vol.331 (21 January 1988). Page 215.

Skladany, M. 1992. People, Poultry, Pig, Fish and Social Viruses : The Integrated Aquaculture-Human Influenza Pandemic Controversy or "Give me a Fish Pond and I'll Either Feed or Infect the whole World". In Paper presented at the 8th World Congress for Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. 19 pages.

Shevgoor, L., Knud-Hansen, C. F., Edwards, P., 1994. An assessment of the role of buffalo manure for pond culture of tilapia. III, limiting factors. Aquaculture 126: 107-118.

Schroeder, G.L., 1978. Autotrophic and Hetrotrophic production of micro-organisms in intensely manured fish ponds, and related fish yields. Aquaculture 14:303-325.

Sin, A. W-C. 1980. Integrated Animal-Fish Husbandry Systems in Hong Kong with Special Case Studies on Duck-Fish and Goose-Fish Systems. In Proceedings of the ICLARM-SEARCA Conference on Integrated Agriculture-Aquaculture Farming systems, Manila Philippines, 6-9 Aug, 1979. (EDS: Pullin, R.S.V., Shehadeh, Z.H.) International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, and the Southeast Asian Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture, College, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines. page 113-123.

Taiganides, E. P., 1979. Wastes are...resources out of place. Agricultural Wastes,1:1-9.

Theimsiri, S.1992. New concept on poultry breeder management in tropical countries 65-71. In Proceedings of Luang Suwan International Poultry Symmposium, the Sixth Animal Science Congress of AAAP, 27-28 November, 1992, Bangkok.129 p.

Ullah, M.D. 1989. Nutrient release characteristics of duck manure for Nile tilapia production. MSc. thesis. AIT. 67 p

Wohlfarth and Schroeder, 1979. Use of manure in fish farming-a review. Agricultural Wastes 1:279-299

Yakupitiyage, A., P. Edwards and K.L. Wee. 1991. Supplementary feeding of fish in a duck-fish integrated system.I. The effect of rice-bran, p. 143-157. In S.S. De Silva (ed.) Fish nutrition research in Asia. Proceedings of the Fourth Asian Fish Nutrition Workshop. Asian Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ. 5, 205 p. Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, Philippines.

Contact | Terms of Use | Article Submission Terms | Advertising | Fish Supplier Registration | Equipment Supplier Registration
© 2014 Aquafind All Rights Reserved | Powered by Successful Hosting